jesse
@ April 6, 2009


----------
3
Banks made alot of sketchy investments, and those investments turned into shit. Now, somebody has to eat all that shit.

The banks don't want to eat that shit, so they've convinced the government to make the taxpayers eat shit instead.  The taxpayers are getting upset, but, in reality, we've only eaten a small amount of the shit there is to eat. As we've seen with AIG, as soon as your done eating your pile of shit, they come back with more and refill your plate. Dig in.

Eventually, we must come to the realization that yes, we are going to have to eat shit. But before we eat shit, we should make the banks eat shit. So you make the bank executives, stockholders, and private investors eat all the shit they can handle. Stuff them full of it. Then, the taxpayer will eat whatever shit is left over. And believe me, there will still be lots of shit to eat.

But then, when it is over, the shit will be gone, and we'll all have stomach aches, but we can all move past this shit.

----------

Between this and your Yankee post, you've been on quite the coprophilia kick lately.

Slightly more to your point, I like the way that CreditSuisse handled a good chunk of their plate of poo: giving it to the executives as bonuses.

Is there a situation where eating shit is not an incredibly apt and vivid metaphor?


Have you forgotten our ancestral family crest that says "Eat Shit and Die".

Because of the great lessons that my parents taught me I think a big plate of shit can be deadly (and not very tasty).

Leave a comment