jesse
@ December 12, 2008


----------
3
Did you know Eliot Spitzer is still alive? And he has a column on Slate.com? And yes, it is in fact Disgraced Former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer(tm), not just some unfortunate jerk with the same name.  Today he writes about the failed auto bailout:

"We all know that a significant downsizing of auto-industry capacity is necessary. Maintaining all three companies is probably not economically feasible. We also know that the incipiency of bankruptcy tends to focus the mind and produce real offers. Why don't we tell the current Big Three that $25 billion in capital is available--but only to two of them?"
He wants to dangle the money in front of the 3 auto makers, and then have them fight it out to decide who actually gets bailed out.  Incidentally, this is the same process he used to decide which hookers to have sex with. 

Okay, low blow, but this idea is still a complete joke. Even as we watch the slow-motion collapse of our economy brought about by a slavish devotion to the concept of the free market, I still need to listen to nonsense like this.  We are going to create a MARKET FOR GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS? Are you serious? I don't know, maybe my irony detector was malfunctioning as I read this.  Go back and tell me if Spitzer was being serious, or if this was meant to be a "Modest Proposal"-esque essay on the state of free market economics.

----------

Why not combine it with the other default terrible idea recommended by uncreative columnists: make a reality show out of it!

Frankly I considered the loss of Eliot Spitzer as a figure due to essentially non-job related issues a shame, but if he's actually this dumb I find it hard to summon much sympathy any more.

I'm not sure we lost him to non-job related issues... it just depends what kind of "job" we are talking about!

ZING!!! Thank you I'll be here all day.

As self-proclaimed ObscureCraft Satire Recognition Watchdog, I find no fault in your irony detector. Spitzer appears to be looking for a way to make government bailouts more appealing by marrying them to their sworn enemy, free market capitalism. No matter how "capitalism-ish" you make the bailout, you still don't have a situation where the people making the decision are actually putting their own money where their mouth is. Of course, if anyone actually wanted to invest their own money in Detroit, we wouldn't be in this situation.

Leave a comment